Press "Enter" to skip to content

Bypassing Kotlin’s Null-Safety

In this short article, we’ll have a look at how we can bypass Kotlin’s native null-safety with sun.misc.Unsafe, and see why it can be dangerous even if we aren’t messing up with it directly.

Mythical sun.misc.Unsafe

The sun.misc.Unsafe class is an internal JVM tool for executing low-level operations like off-heap memory allocation, thread parking, CAS, and much more.

This class is like one of those scary computer game creatures that are there only to intimidate us, in theory, we can’t get close because they are part of the environment, but it’s often possible by exploiting glitches or holes.

If we try to access the Unsafe instance, we encounter a private constructor, and a static getUnsafe() method that raises a SecurityException practically every time we call it:

public final class Unsafe {
    private static final Unsafe theUnsafe;
    // ...

    private Unsafe() {

    public static Unsafe getUnsafe() {
        Class var0 = Reflection.getCallerClass();
        if (!VM.isSystemDomainLoader(var0.getClassLoader())) {
            throw new SecurityException("Unsafe");
        } else {
            return theUnsafe;

So, in theory, it’s guarded by a strong encapsulation, and an exception being thrown on every getUnsafe() call… but we do have the Reflection mechanism, and we can easily bypass those:

companion object {
   private fun getUnsafe(): Unsafe ="theUnsafe")
         .apply { isAccessible = true }
         .let { it.get(null) as Unsafe }

Mighty Unsafe.allocateInstance()

This method allocates an empty instance of a given class directly on the heap, ignoring field initialization and constructors.

And this allows us, indeed, to effectively bypass Kotlin’s safety checks:

A cool thing to do on Friday evening, but what about just not using Unsafe and staying (null) safe?

The Problem: Unsafe in External Libraries

The problem is that most Java libraries were written with Java in mind, where using Unsafe for certain scenarios is slightly less unsafe than it is, e.g., for Kotlin.

This is especially the case with serialization/deserialization libraries – one such is Google’s Gson, which internally uses Unsafe for instantiating objects – which is acceptable for Java.

If we start using it in Kotlin, we indeed might end up with an undesired behaviour observed above:

fun unsafe_2() {
    val foo = Gson().fromJson("{}",


In this case, we simply need to perform checks manually after instantiation, which is not super problematic. What’s disturbing is the lack of consciousness that this happens, which can cost much.

Are you sure the library you are using is not doing that internally? There are a couple of them out there.

Code snippets can be found on GitHub.

Key Takeaways

  • Kotlin’s null-safety doesn’t go beyond objects’ initialization phase and is bypassable
  • External libraries that use Unsafe internally can do that too – it’s essential to be aware of this

If you enjoyed the content, consider supporting the site: